4.1 Review

Aging and Apolipoprotein E in HIV Infection

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROVIROLOGY
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 529-548

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13365-018-0660-2

关键词

Human immunodeficiency virus; Neurocognitive impairment; Aging; Apolipoprotein E

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the implementation of increasingly effective antiretroviral therapy (ART) over the past three decades, individuals infected with HIV live a much longer life. HIV infection is no longer a terminal but rather a chronic disease. However, the lifespan of infected individuals remains shorter than that of their uninfected peers. Even with ART, HIV infection may potentiate premature aging. Organ-associated disease and systemic syndromes that occur in treated HIV-infection are like that of older, uninfected individuals. Brain aging may manifest as structural changes or neurocognitive impairment that are beyond the chronological age. The spectrum of neurological, cognitive, and motor deficiencies, currently described as HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND), may reflect earlier onset of mechanisms common to HIV infection and aging (accelerated aging). HAND could also reflect the neurological impact of HIV infection superimposed on comorbidities linked to age and chronic inflammation, leading to a higher prevalence of neurocognitive impairment across the age span (accentuated aging). In addition, apolipoprotein E (ApoE), one of the most influential host risk factors for developing Alzheimer's disease, has been implicated in the development of HAND. But studies differ as to whether ApoE is relevant, and whether age and ApoE interact to impair brain function in the HIV-infected patient. What is clear is that HIV-infected individuals are living longer with HIV, and therefore factors related to aging and health need to be examined in the context of current, effective ART. This review addresses the recent evidence for the influence of aging and ApoE on HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据