4.5 Article

Nutritional quality of different grades of adult male chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir sinensis

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER INDIA
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-017-3002-0

关键词

Chinese mitten crab; Grade/size difference; Various edible parts; Food composition; Nutritional quality

资金

  1. Shanghai Agriculture Committee [2015-1-7]
  2. Science & Technology Committee of Chongming County [CKZ2015-02]
  3. Shanghai Municipal Education Committee [2015-62-0908]
  4. Shanghai Engineering and Technology Center from Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission the Special Fund of Chinese Agriculture Research System-47 from Ministry of Agriculture of China [16DZ2281200, 13DZ2280500, CARS-46]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study mainly investigated the composition of adult male Chinese mitten crab (Eriocheir sinensis) from four grades/sizes (Grade I: 200-249 g; Grade II: 175-199 g; Grade III: 150-174 g; Grade IV: ae 150 g). The results showed that the grade III crabs had the largest gonadsomatic index (GSI), which was significantly higher than the grade I and grade II crabs, no significant difference was found with the grade IV crab. Significant differences in moisture and total lipid contents were observed among various edible parts from different grades of male Eriocheir sinensis. In particular, grade II crabs had the highest total lipid and dry matter content for hepatopancreas. A balanced amino acids composition and a high essential amino acids score (EAAS) were found in the muscle and gonads of grade III crabs. The levels of poly-unsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), n-3 PUFA, n-6 PUFA and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in the hepatopancreas, as well as the contents of PUFA, highly-unsaturated fatty acids (HUFA), n-3 PUFA, arachidonic acid (ARA), and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) in the gonads were significantly increased in the grade II crabs. Taken together, it can generally be concluded that adult male Eriocheir sinensis of 150-200 g (Grade II-III) weight have the highest nutritional quality even though they are not the largest crabs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据