4.5 Article

Successful encapsulation of β-glucosidase during the synthesis of siliceous mesostructured materials

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.5616

关键词

enzyme immobilization; beta-glucosidase; in-situ; ordered mesoporous silica materials; post-synthesis

资金

  1. Spanish State Research Agency (Agencia Espanola de Investigacion, AEI)
  2. European Regional Development Fund (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, FEDER) [MAT2016-77496-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUNDThe biocatalysis field demands universal' supports able to encapsulate enzymes with a straightforward methodology, and at the same time, capable of retaining their catalytic activity. The employment of siliceous materials for such a purpose is a big challenge because drastic synthesis conditions are required and improved functionalization is needed to increase affinities towards the targeted enzyme. In this work, a compromise between the development of a well-formed mesostructured support and an acceptable enzymatic activity was attempted via the in-situ immobilization approach. RESULTSThe immobilization of -glucosidase (EC 3.2.1.21) from Aspergillus niger was approached using different strategies. After trying to immobilize -glucosidase with a post-synthesis approach, nonhigh loadings were achieved both with covalent linkage (using epoxy activated supports; 3.5 mgE g(-1)) and with noncovalent bonding (using amine-functionalized materials; 7.6 mgE g(-1)). However, when the in-situ approach was attempted, success in reaching the highest enzyme loading (close to 200 mgE g(-1)) was achieved. CONCLUSIONIn this work, the support cages around the in-situ encapsulated enzyme fully prevented its release through the narrow windows connecting cages, achieving a less than 5% release of the initially desorbed protein, as well as a further total absence of leaching. This enabled the biocatalyst to be reused at least eight times more without any loss in activity. (c) 2018 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据