4.5 Article

Confrontation of the Ohmic approach with the ionic transport approach for modeling the electrical behavior of an electrolyte

期刊

IONICS
卷 24, 期 7, 页码 2157-2165

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-018-2460-3

关键词

Transport of ions; Electric current density; Faradaic reaction; Laplace equation; Poisson-Nernst-Planck (PNP) equations; Butler-Volmer formula; Electroslag remelting (ESR)

资金

  1. Montanuniversity Leoben
  2. Austrian Federal Ministry of Economy, Family and Youth and the National Foundation for Research, Technology and Development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two mathematical approaches have been compared for modeling the electrical behavior (e.g., electric/current density field) of an electrolyte. The first approach uses the traditional Ohmic method (Laplace equation) based on the assumption of a uniform concentration of ions in the electrolyte. The second approach utilizes the ionic transport method that takes into account the effect of electrochemical transport/reaction of ions assuming a quasi-electro neutral bulk for the electrolyte. For the latter, the Poisson-Nernst-Planck (PNP) equations are employed to include impacts of the non-uniformity of the concentration of ions on the electrical pattern of the electrolyte. Demonstratively, a 2D case was studied. It comprises two unequally sized electrodes, which are separated by the electrolyte. Findings show that the electrical behavior of the electrolyte remains unchanged using an Ohmic approach, regardless of variations in operational parameters such as applied voltage and electrode polarity. In contrast, the electrical behavior in response to the operational parameters is found to be significantly influenced using the ionic transport approach. Therefore, Ohm's law is invalid in the bulk of an electrolyte, when a non-uniform concentration field of ions exists. Ultimately, the obtained results helped to propose an explanation on a commonly observed phenomenon (melt rate-polarity relationship) during the DC operation of the electroslag remelting (ESR) process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据