友情提示：以下期刊信息可能会有更新，仅供参考，请在投稿前自行登录期刊官网仔细核实。
期刊名
IONICS
IONICS
ISSN / eISSN
0947-7047 / 1862-0760
目标和范围
Ionics is publishing original results in the fields of science and technology of ionic motion. This includes theoretical, experimental and practical work on electrolytes, electrode, ionic/electronic interfaces, ionic transport aspects of corrosion, galvanic cells, e.g. for thermodynamic and kinetic studies, batteries, fuel cells, sensors and electrochromics. Fast solid ionic conductors are presently providing new opportunities in view of several advantages, in addition to conventional liquid electrolytes.
研究方向
物理化学
电化学
物理：凝聚态物理
CiteScore
5.10
查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
| 类别 | 分区 | 排名 |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering - General Engineering | Q1 | #58/302 |
| Engineering - General Physics and Astronomy | Q2 | #67/240 |
| Engineering - General Chemical Engineering | Q2 | #90/272 |
| Engineering - General Materials Science | Q2 | #165/453 |
Web of Science 核心合集
| Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) | Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) |
|---|---|
| Indexed | - |
| 类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) | 分区 |
|---|---|
| CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL - SCIE | Q3 |
| ELECTROCHEMISTRY - SCIE | Q3 |
| PHYSICS, CONDENSED MATTER - SCIE | Q2 |
H-index
48
出版国家或地区
GERMANY
出版商
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
出版周期
Bimonthly
出版年份
1995
年文章数
486
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
SPRINGER HEIDELBERG, TIERGARTENSTRASSE 17, HEIDELBERG, GERMANY, D-69121
认证评论
The revision period given by the editor is quite long (4 months).
March 20th - Submission
April 14th - Major revision (3-6 questions from two reviewers)
May 7th - Revision (added key experiments and characterization for one month)
June 2nd - Major revision (one acceptance, two questions from another reviewer)
June 4th - Revision (mainly modifying the content of the paper)
July 2nd - Acceptance (had to urge once, but this time the review was really slow!!)
Summary: This is my first work, and my advisor is not very familiar with electrochemistry. A lot of time was wasted during the initial draft revision (2 months before submission). In the end, I submitted the original version. The process was quite challenging. I can only wait for the academic committee in September and make revisions according to the reviewers' comments.
Recommendation: If the advisor is not knowledgeable in a certain field, it is advisable to discuss and make revisions based on one's own understanding. It is better to seek advice from senior students in the field of electrochemistry whom you know.
12.30 Received reviewers' comments, three reviewers, minor revisions. At one point, it changed from "under review" to "awaiting EIC consideration" and then changed back to "under review", probably because the opinions of two reviewers were not enough, so another reviewer was sought.
1.18 Submitted revisions.
1.20 Accepted.
It only took a little over a month from the initial submission to acceptance, although some time was delayed due to my vacation at home. Otherwise, it could have been controlled within a month.
Both the editor and the reviewers were very diligent and responsible. Thumbs up!
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now