4.6 Article

ZP2 pathogenic variants cause in vitro fertilization failure and female infertility

期刊

GENETICS IN MEDICINE
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 431-440

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41436-018-0064-y

关键词

Fertilization failure; Zona pellucida; ZP2; Causative gene; Exome sequencing

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC1000200]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81222007, 81471510, 81372627]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [907010003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The oocyte-borne genetic causes leading to fertilization failure are largely unknown. We aimed to identify novel human pathogenic variants (PV) and genes causing fertilization failure. Methods: We performed exome sequencing for a consanguineous family with a recessive inheritance pattern of female infertility characterized by oocytes with a thin zona pellucida (ZP) and fertilization failure in routine in vitro fertilization. Subsequent PV screening of ZP2 was performed in additional eight unrelated infertile women whose oocytes exhibited abnormal ZP and similar fertilization failure. Expression of ZP proteins was assessed in mutant oocytes by immunostaining, and functional studies of the wild-type and mutant proteins were carried out in CHO-K1 cells. Results: Two homozygous s PV (c.1695-2A>G, and c.1691_1694dup (p.C566Wfs*5), respectively) of ZP2 were identified in the affected women from two unrelated consanguineous families. All oocytes carrying PV were surrounded by a thin ZP that was defective for sperm-binding. Immunostaining indicated a lack of ZP2 protein in the thin ZP. Studies in CHO cells showed that both PV resulted in a truncated ZP2 protein, which might be intracellularly sequestered and prematurely interacted with other ZP proteins. Conclusion: We identified loss-of-function PV of ZP2 causing a structurally abnormal and dysfunctional ZP, resulting in fertilization failure and female infertility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据