4.7 Article

Effects of microbial diversity on nitrite concentration in pao cai, a naturally fermented cabbage product from China

期刊

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 72, 期 -, 页码 185-192

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2017.12.003

关键词

Pao cai; Microbiome; 16S rRNA gene; PICRUSt; Lactobacillus; Nitrogen metabolism

资金

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [GK201603097]
  2. Science and Technology Research and Development Program of Shaanxi Province, China [2016NY-207]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pao cai is a spontaneously fermented cabbage where native bacteria may have an important influence on nitrite content during fermentation. In this research, we used metagenomic-based 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to analyze differences in bacterial composition of pao cai from Hohhot City (northern China) and Guiyang City (southern China). Alongside this, metagenome functional features from the 16S rRNA genes of the microbiome were predicted and correlated with the nitrite content of pao cai. Nitrite-reducing bacterial genera were identified including Lactobacillus (73.37%), Pediococcus (0.93%), Acinetobacter (0.74%), Leuconostoc (0.31%), Weissella (0.14%), Streptococcus (0.09%), Megamonas (0.08%), Enterococcus (0.07%), and Alistipes (0.06%). Lactobacillus was the predominant genus in both the northern and the southern pao cai samples and was significantly negatively correlated with nitrite content; it was more abundant in southern samples than northern samples. Based on determination of alpha and beta diversities of the microbiome in samples, differences in the microbiome of northern and southern pao cai were demonstrated that may influence nitrogen metabolism. This research suggests that 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing is an effective way to comprehensively study the microbes with potential nitrite formation or decomposition ability instead of investigating the individual bacterial genera. (c) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据