4.6 Article

Carbon coated MoS2 nanosheets vertically grown on carbon cloth as efficient anode for high-performance sodium ion hybrid capacitors

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 283, 期 -, 页码 36-44

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.082

关键词

MoS2; Carbon cloth; Activated carbon; Sodium ion batteries; Hybrid capacitors

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB932400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1401243]
  3. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51232005]
  4. Shenzhen Technical Plan Project [JCYJ20150529164918735, JCYJ20170412170911187, KQJSCX20160226191136]
  5. Guangdong Technical Plan Project [2015TX01N011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sodium-ion hybrid capacitors (NIHC) with sodium ion battery type anodes and supercapacitor type cathodes are emerging as an attractive energy storage device due to the integration of high energy, high power and long lifetime. However, the battery type electrodes usually exhibit sluggish reaction kinetics than capacitor type cathodes due to slow Na ion insertion and extraction, which greatly hinders the rate performance. In this paper, carbon coated MoS2 nanosheets are vertically grown on carbon cloth (CC) substrate using a hydrothermal reaction followed by calcination. The expanded interlayer distance of the MoS2 ensures high ionic mobility while the highly conductive CC not only provides a self-supporting structure without the addition of insulative binder and additional conductive additive, but also effectively prevents the restacking of the MoS2 sheets during cycling. Thus the architecture delivers a high area capacity of 0.511 mAh cm(-2) at a current density of 0.2 mA cm(-2) and a stable capacity retention of 83.3% after 200 cycles at 1 mA cm(-2). Furthermore, NIHC constructed with above anode delivers a high areal energy density of 1.22 m Wh cm(-2) at a power of 0.76 mW cm(-2), demonstrating an excellent energy-power delivery. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据