4.6 Article

High energy density aqueous asymmetric supercapacitors based on MnO2@C branch dendrite nanoarchitectures

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 283, 期 -, 页码 603-610

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.07.006

关键词

MnO2@C branch-dendrite; In-situ growth; Broad voltage window; Aqueous asymmetric supercapacitor; High energy density

资金

  1. MOST [2016YFA0202500]
  2. NSFC [51471089, 51601127]
  3. MOE [IRT13R30]
  4. NSFT [17JCYBJC17900]
  5. 111 Project [B12015]
  6. Hundred Talents Program of Tianjin University of Technology
  7. Youth Thousand Talents Program of Tianjin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The flourishing development of the asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) device has improved the energy density of supercapacitor in some extent. However, the energy density of the present ASC device is too low to meet the requirement of daily life. The two principal factors determining the energy density are the specific capacitance and the voltage window of the ASC device, which are closely related with the kinds of the electrode materials and the electrolytes. In this work, a new MnO2@C branch-dendrite (MnO2@C-BD) nanoarchitectures as a whole have been triumphantly in-situ prepared and acted as the cathode materials of the ASC device. Moreover, the MnO2@C-BD materials are assembled by innumerable MnO2 nanoparticles coated by the thin carbon layer which provides porous texture and benefits the transportation of ions and electrons. The electrochemical performances of the MnO2@C-BD electrode were assessed in 5 M lithium bistrifluoromethanesulfonimide (LiTFSI) electrolyte with the purpose of broaden voltage window aqueous electrolyte. Subsequently, the nanoporous carbon (NPC) materials have been acted as the anode for the MnO2@C-BD//NPC ASC device. As we expected that the MnO2@C-BD// NPC ASC device can offer 3 V voltage window and exhibit the maximum energy density of 88.7 Wh kg(-1) at 103 W kg(-1) power density. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据