4.3 Article

Biologics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis: An Update and Thoughts for Future Directions

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RHINOLOGY & ALLERGY
卷 32, 期 5, 页码 412-423

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1945892418787132

关键词

biologic therapy; Th17; biologics; inflammation; chronic rhinosinusitis; systemic therapy; Th2; polyps; Th1; eosinophilia

资金

  1. University of Utah Program in Personalized Health
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [KL2TR001065]
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [R43 AI126987-01]
  4. Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute [CIA160008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Potential biologic therapies for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a growing field of interest and research. Biologics target specific immune cells or inflammatory pathways within a disease process, increasing drug efficacy while reducing complications. The success of biologics in other inflammatory conditions such as asthma and atopic dermatitis has spurred much of the corresponding research in CRS. A rapid expansion in the volume of research concerning biologic therapies with potential crossover to treating CRS has made it difficult to stay current. Furthermore, much of the literature has been focused on allergy, asthma, and immunology subspecialties. As the role for biologic therapies in CRS continues to expand, it is increasingly important for otolaryngologists to remain up to date on their progression. Objective: The objectives of this review are to provide an update on the growing field of biologics for otolaryngologists who treat CRS and discuss potential future areas of research. Methods: A literature review of biologic therapies studied in CRS was performed. In addition, a detailed review of all biologic therapies targeting inflammatory markers involved in Th1-, Th2-, and Th17-mediated inflammation was performed to identify potential areas for future research. The role for biologic therapies in CRS, endotypes of CRS, current biologic therapies studies in CRS, and future areas for research were reviewed. Results: Sixty-nine unique biologic therapies have been developed for Th1-, Th2-, and Th 17-mediated inflammation. Five biologics are currently being investigated for use in patients with CRS with nasal polyposis. Conclusions: As the field of biologics continues to expand, remaining up to date on the current literature may help clinicians identify patients who may benefit from biologic therapies. In addition, ongoing research in other inflammatory disorders with shared pathophysiology to CRS may reveal other potential therapies for CRS that have not previously been investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据