Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for treatment of degenerative lumbar disease: systematic review and meta-analysis

Comment on Tian et al.: Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence

(2014) Feng Li et al.   EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF)

(2014) Albert P. Wong et al.   NEUROSURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA

Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence

(2013) Nai-Feng Tian et al.   EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL

Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive versus open approach for one-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the 3- to 4-year follow-up

(2013) Javier Rodríguez-Vela et al.   EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL

Comparison of minimally invasive fusion and instrumentation versus open surgery for severe stenotic spondylolisthesis with high-grade facet joint osteoarthritis

(2013) Eleftherios Archavlis et al.   EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL

Comparison of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in two-level degenerative lumbar disease

(2013) Guangfei Gu et al.   INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS

Short-term and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions: is there a difference?

(2013) Jason S. Cheng et al.   Neurosurgical Focus

Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients

(2013) Darryl Lau et al.   Neurosurgical Focus

Five-Year Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

(2013) Chusheng Seng et al.   SPINE

A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

(2013) Kern Singh et al.   Spine Journal

Minimally Invasive versus Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Comparative Effectiveness and Cost-Utility Analysis

(2013) Scott L. Parker et al.   World Neurosurgery

Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison between Open and Mini-Open Approaches with Two Years Follow-Up

(2013) A. Arikat et al.   Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A-Central European Neurosurgery

Learning Curve and Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

(2012) Jae Chul Lee et al.   SPINE

Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression

(2011) Richard J. Mannion et al.   JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES

Comparison of one-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in degenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2

(2010) Jian Wang et al.   EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL

An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion

(2010) Michael Y. Wang et al.   JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE

Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Diseases

(2010) Fan Shunwu et al.   SPINE

Impact of instrumentation in lumbar spinal fusion in elderly patients

(2009) Thomas Andersen et al.   Acta Orthopaedica

Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion for Revision Lumbar Surgery

(2009) Lee A. Selznick et al.   JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES

The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration

(2009) Alessandro Liberati et al.   PLOS MEDICINE

Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience

(2008) Constantin Schizas et al.   INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS

Percutaneous techniques for minimally invasive posterior lumbar fusion

(2008) Eric B. Harris et al.   Neurosurgical Focus

Minimally invasive spine surgery

(2008) Adam S. Kanter et al.   Neurosurgical Focus