Reporting and methodological quality of meta-analyses in urological literature

Quality of meta-analyses in major leading gastroenterology and hepatology journals: A systematic review

(2017) Pengfei Liu et al.   JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY

Reporting and methodological qualities of published surgical meta-analyses

(2016) Han Zhang et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Quality of Conduct and Reporting of Meta-analyses of Surgical Interventions

(2015) Sam Adie et al.   ANNALS OF SURGERY

Critical appraisal of AMSTAR: challenges, limitations, and potential solutions from the perspective of an assessor

(2015) Clovis Mariano Faggion   BMC Medical Research Methodology

Preservation of the Neurovascular Bundles Is Associated with Improved Time to Continence After Radical Prostatectomy But Not Long-term Continence Rates: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

(2015) Fairleigh Reeves et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY

Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties

(2015) Dawid Pieper et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

What is publication bias in a meta-analysis?

(2015) Philip Sedgwick   BMJ-British Medical Journal

What is publication bias in a meta-analysis?

(2015) Philip Sedgwick   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Association Between Analytic Strategy and Estimates of Treatment Outcomes in Meta-analyses

(2014) Agnes Dechartres et al.   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

Meta-analysis as Evidence

(2014) Jesse A. Berlin et al.   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review

(2014) A. Bafeta et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration

(2013) Alessandro Liberati   ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

Soy and soy isoflavones in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

(2013) M. Diana van Die et al.   BJU INTERNATIONAL

Synthesizing Evidence

(2013) M. Hassan Murad et al.   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews in the Orthopaedic Literature

(2013) Joel J. Gagnier et al.   JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME

Association of Study Quality with Completeness of Reporting: Have Completeness of Reporting and Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Major Radiology Journals Changed Since Publication of the PRISMA Statement?

(2013) Adam S. Tunis et al.   RADIOLOGY

Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review

(2013) A. Bafeta et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal

Positive Surgical Margin and Perioperative Complication Rates of Primary Surgical Treatments for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Prostatectomy

(2012) Ashutosh Tewari et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY

AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

(2009) Beverley J. Shea et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

(2009) David Moher et al.   PLOS MEDICINE