4.6 Article

Lanthanide-doped LaOBr nanocrystals: controlled synthesis, optical spectroscopy and bioimaging

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 5, 期 25, 页码 4827-4834

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7tb00857k

关键词

-

资金

  1. 973 program of MOST [2014CB845605]
  2. NSFC [U1305244, 21325104, 81572944, 51402294]
  3. CAS/SAFEA International Partnership Program for Creative Research Teams, the Strategic Priority Research Program of the CAS [XDA09030307, XDB20000000]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association [2014264]
  5. Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2017I0018]
  6. Chunmiao Project of Haixi Institutes of the CAS [CMZX-2014-003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lanthanide (Ln3+)-doped nanocrystals (NCs) have shown great promise in diverse bioapplications. Exploring new host materials to realize efficient downshifting (DS) and upconversion (UC) luminescence is a goal of general concern. Ln(3+)-doped oxybromides, which bring together the advantages of high chemical/thermal stability of oxides and low phonon energy of bromides, have been rarely reported so far. Herein, we report the synthesis of monodisperse tetragonal-phase LaOBr: Ln(3+) NCs via a modified thermal decomposition approach. Ln(3+) dopants in LaOBr NCs occupying surface and lattice sites were verified based on high-resolution photoluminescence spectra of Eu3+ at 10 K. Intense DS emissions were observed in Ce3+ and Ce3+/Tb3+ doped LaOBr NCs upon excitation at 353.0 nm, which is far from the deep-UV absorption band of proteins. Moreover, UC properties of LaOBr: Yb3+/Ho3+ and Yb3+/Er3+ NCs were comprehensively surveyed upon near-infrared excitation at 980 nm. Particularly, the red-togreen ratio can be markedly increased from 0.1 to similar to 300 in LaOBr: Yb3+/Er3+ NCs, resulting in high-chromatic-purity single-band red UC emission. Furthermore, we have employed the LaOBr: Ln(3+) NCs for cancer cell imaging by virtue of their superior optical properties, showing great potential of LaOBr:Ln(3+) nanoprobes in bioimaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据