Journal of Materials Chemistry B

期刊名
Journal of Materials Chemistry B

J MATER CHEM B

ISSN / eISSN
2050-7518 / 2050-750X
目标和范围
Materials for biology and medicine
研究方向

材料科学:生物材料

CiteScore
11.50 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Engineering - Biomedical Engineering Q1 #29/277
Engineering - General Chemistry Q1 #43/407
Engineering - General Materials Science Q1 #58/453
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS - SCIE Q1
H-index
71
出版国家或地区
ENGLAND
出版商
Royal Society of Chemistry
年文章数
802
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBS, CB4 0WF
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
The review process is a bit slow, completely unlike the average 6+28 days advertised by the journal. I submitted on August 9th, and it wasn't in peer review until the 17th. On the 22nd, it changed to "with editor," and on the 29th, it was "under review" again. On September 1st, it went back to "with editor," coinciding with the lockdown in Chengdu. On the 5th, I couldn't wait any longer and asked the editor, but surprisingly, I hadn't received any peer review results. None of the reviewers had reviewed it. On the 7th, it went back to "under review" again, and on the 10th, it was "with editor" once more. On the night of the 12th, it went back to "under review" again, and a few hours later, it was "with editor" again. On the 13th, I couldn't resist asking the editor again, and finally received a peer review result. I guess it was written by the reviewer who spent several hours reviewing it. On the 15th, it went back to "under review" once more, and finally, on the 21st, I received the editor's decision. Minor revisions, mostly regarding language and formatting. Thank goodness! The quality of articles in JMCB seems good, but the review process is just too slow. Maybe it's because everyone was on vacation in August, and there were no reviewers available, or perhaps no one was willing to review for free.
2022-09-23
The paper in the field of tissue engineering took a little over a month for the first review, with two reviewers providing very professional suggestions for revisions. They recommended additional experiments and had quite challenging perspectives. One of the reviewers raised innovative questions, but the editor still asked for major revisions. After the revisions, the second review took only a week, and the paper was given minor revisions. The reviewers only pointed out language issues (although the revisions had already been proofread, oops). The revised paper was accepted in less than a week. The editor's efficiency was quite high, and the reviewers were very professional. The editor was very nice. Once again, I am grateful to JMCB and wish JMCB continued success!
2022-02-16

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Create your own webinar

Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.

Create Now