4.3 Article

Histone peptide microarray screen of chromo and Tudor domains defines new histone lysine methylation interactions

期刊

EPIGENETICS & CHROMATIN
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13072-017-0117-5

关键词

Chromatin; Histone methylation; Chromodomain; Tudor domain; Peptide microarray

资金

  1. Longwood University
  2. NIGMS IRACDA [K12- GM000678]
  3. UNC Lineberger Cancer Center Postdoctoral Fellowship
  4. NIH [GM110058, DK062248, CA181343]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Histone posttranslational modifications (PTMs) function to regulate chromatin structure and function in part through the recruitment of effector proteins that harbor specialized reader domains. Despite efforts to elucidate reader domain-PTM interactions, the influence of neighboring PTMs and the target specificity of many reader domains is still unclear. The aim of this study was to use a high-throughput histone peptide microarray platform to interrogate 83 known and putative histone reader domains from the chromo and Tudor domain families to identify their interactions and characterize the influence of neighboring PTMs on these interactions. Results: Nearly a quarter of the chromo and Tudor domains screened showed interactions with histone PTMs by peptide microarray, revealing known and several novel methyllysine interactions. Specifically, we found that the CBX/HP1 chromodomains that recognize H3K9me also recognize H3K23me2/ 3- a poorly understood histone PTM. We also observed that, in addition to their interaction with H3K4me3, Tudor domains of the Spindlin family also recognized H4K20me3- a previously uncharacterized interaction. Several Tudor domains also showed novel interactions with H3K4me as well. Conclusions: These results provide an important resource for the epigenetics and chromatin community on the interactions of many human chromo and Tudor domains. They also provide the basis for additional studies into the functional significance of the novel interactions that were discovered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据