4.4 Article

Muscle activation during three sets to failure at 80 vs. 30 % 1RM resistance exercise

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 115, 期 11, 页码 2335-2347

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-015-3214-9

关键词

Electromyography; Skeletal muscle; Muscle fatigue; Muscle size; Resistance training intensity; Exercise volume

资金

  1. University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division
  2. Hatch Act (Agency: United States Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture) [1000080, NEB-36-078]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to investigate electromyographic amplitude (EMG AMP), EMG mean power frequency (MPF), exercise volume (VOL), total work and muscle activation (iEMG), and time under concentric load (TUCL) during, and muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) before and after 3 sets to failure at 80 vs. 30 % 1RM resistance exercise. Nine men (mean +/- A SD, age 21.0 +/- A 2.4 years, resistance training week(-1) 6.0 +/- A 3.7 h) and 9 women (age 22.8 +/- A 3.8 years, resistance training week(-1) 3.4 +/- A 3.5 h) completed 1RM testing, followed by 2 experimental sessions during which they completed 3 sets to failure of leg extension exercise at 80 or 30 % 1RM. EMG signals were collected to quantify EMG AMP and MPF during the initial, middle, and last repetition of each set. Ultrasound was used to assess mCSA pre- and post-exercise, and VOL, total work, iEMG, and TUCL were calculated. EMG AMP remained greater at 80 % than 30 % 1RM across all reps and sets, despite increasing 74 and 147 % across reps at 80 and 30 % 1RM, respectively. EMG MPF decreased across reps at 80 and 30 % 1RM, but decreased more and was lower for the last reps at 30 than 80 % 1RM (71.6 vs. 78.1 % MVIC). mCSA increased more from pre- to post-exercise for 30 % (20.2-24.1 cm(2)) than 80 % 1RM (20.3-22.8 cm(2)). VOL, total work, iEMG and TUCL were greater for 30 % than 80 % 1RM. Muscle activation was greater at 80 % 1RM. However, differences in volume, metabolic byproduct accumulation, and muscle swelling may help explain the unexpected adaptations in hypertrophy vs. strength observed in previous studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据