4.6 Article

Optimization of Pt-Pd alloy catalyst and supporting materials for oxygen reduction in air-cathode Microbial Fuel Cells

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 72-77

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.235

关键词

Pt-Pd catalyst; microbial fuel cells; oxygen reduction activity; electro-deposition

资金

  1. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20130003110028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Pt-Pd alloy catalyst was fabricated on carbon papers via electro-deposition as an alternative catalyst for oxygen reduction in air-cathode Microbial Fuel Cells (MFCs). Effects of electro-deposition cycles and supporting materials (graphene and carbon nanotubes (CNTs)) on oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity of the Pt-Pd electrode and power generation in MFCs were investigated. The structural and electrochemical properties of the Pt-Pd catalyst were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Results showed that the Pt-Pd electrode showed a good ORR activity. A MFC with a Pt-Pd cathode of 15 deposition cycles produced a maximum power density of 1274 mWm(-2), comparable to that with a conventional Pt/C cathode (0.5 mg Pt cm(-2)). CNT as the supporting material further increased ORR activity of the Pt-Pd electrode and power generation capacity in MFCs, while graphene as the supporting material did not produce positive effects. XRD results confirmed the presence of Pt/Pd elements on the electrode. SEM results showed that decoration using CNT reduced Pt-Pd particle size and promoted them even dispersion on the carbon paper. The Pt-Pd electrode attained a comparable performance to the Pt/C electrode when controlling an optimum deposition cycles and using CNT as the supporting materials, which demonstrates the potential of replacing Pt as an oxygen reduction catalyst in MFCs due to high oxygen reduction activity and relatively low cost. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据