4.6 Article

Ultrasound assisted synthesis of Mn3O4 nanoparticles anchored graphene nanosheets for supercapacitor applications

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 156, 期 -, 页码 127-137

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.01.052

关键词

Ultrasound; Mn3O4 nanoparticles; Graphene nanosheets; Nanocomposite; Supercapacitors

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi [02 (0021)/11/EMR-II]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mn3O4 nanoparticles anchored graphene nanosheets (MG) have been successfully synthesized by a simple ultrasound assisted synthesis at room temperature without the use of any templates or surfactants for supercapacitor applications. Upon ultrasound assisted synthesis, the formation of Mn3O4 nanoparticles and the graphene oxide reduction occurs simultaneously. The crystalline structure of thus prepared MG nanocomposite have been characterized by the powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis. Thermo Gravimetric Analysis (TGA) is used to determine the mass content of graphene (17 wt%) in the MG nanocomposite. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and Atomic force microscopy (AFM) studies shows that the Mn3O4 nanoparticles (4-8 nm) were uniformly anchored on the surface of graphene nanosheets. The electrochemical properties of the MG nanocomposite were investigated by employing cyclic voltammetry (CV), galvanostatic charge-discharge and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The capacitive properties of MG nanocomposite studied in the presence of 1M Na2SO4 exhibited high specific capacitance of 312 F g (1) which was approximately three times greater than that of pristine Mn3O4 (113 F g (1)) at the same current density of 0.5 mA cm (2) in the potential range from -0.1 to +0.9 V. About 76% of the initial capacitance was retained even after 1000 cycles establishes the fact that MG nanocomposite exhibited good electrochemical stability and capacitance retention capability also. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据