4.6 Article

Enhanced Cycling Stability of Lithium-Sulfur batteries by Electrostatic-Interaction

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 182, 期 -, 页码 884-890

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.10.009

关键词

poly(diallyl dimethylammonium) chloride; electrostatic interaction; cycling stability; grapheme; Lithium-sulfur batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51402100, 21573066]
  2. Youth 1000 Talent Program of China
  3. Inter-discipline Research Programe of Hunan University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithiums-sulfur battery is considered as one of the most promising energy storage devices to replace the current Li ion batteries because of its high theoretical capacity of 1675 mA h g(-1). However, the poor cycle stability hinders the further development of this battery system. In order to improve the stability of Li-S batteries, the diffusion of polysulfides from electrodes into electrolyte should be suppressed. Herein, we utilize a positively charged polyelectrolyte to functionalize the electrode materials with the aim to hamper the polysulfides dissolution via electrostatic interaction between strong positively charged polyelectrolyte and negatively charged polysulfides anion. The effect of the functionalization quantity of poly(diallyl dimethylammonium) chloride (PDDA) and functionalization sequence on cycling performances is investigated in detail. It is found that the sulfur-graphene composite (SG) directly functionalized with 10 times PDDA exhibited best cycling stability. At a discharge current density of 0.2 C, much higher capacity retention was realized on the functionalized electrodes than the unfunctionalized (81% vs. 47.3%) after 120 cycles. The as-observed results demonstrate that the electrostatic interaction can effectively prolong the cycling life of Li-S batteries, which provides a new promising strategy for improving the electrochemical performance of Li-S batteries. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据