4.6 Article

Growth dynamics of nanocrystalline diamond films produced by microwave plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition in methane/hydrogen/air mixture: Scaling analysis of surface morphology

期刊

DIAMOND AND RELATED MATERIALS
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 172-179

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2015.07.002

关键词

Nanocrystalline diamond films; Scaling; Growth dynamics; Roughness; Atomic force microscopy

资金

  1. Estonian Ministry of Education and Research [IUT 19-29, IUT 19-4]
  2. European Union through the European Regional Development Fund [TK114, 3.2.0101.11-0029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanocrystalline diamond (NCD) films were produced by microwave plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (MPCVD) in methane/hydrogen/air plasma. The thickness of the films was varied from 0.15 to 22 pm. X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy and atomic force microscopy (AFM) were used to investigate the structure and surface morphology of the films. During a short initial period of the deposition, i.e. from 2.5 min to 60 min, the growth dynamics involve relatively strong non-local effects, followed by a growth stage, which is characterized by a contribution of non-local and non-linear effects to the growth dynamics. The later regime of growth with roughness exponent alpha similar to 035-0.4 and growth exponent beta similar to 0.25 can be related with the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang (KPZ) scaling regime of growth. The morphological peculiarities observed on the NCD film surface after already 2.5 min of deposition influence the morphology of the films for prolonged deposition time. Therefore, control over the size and distribution of these peculiarities by systematic variation of the deposition parameters allows to optimize the surface morphology for specific applications. The mountain-like patterns observed on the NCD films surface can be related to conformal KPZ growth regime, in contrast to the cusp-like patterns caused by non-local effects and noise. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据