4.7 Review

Novel trends in numerical modelling of plant food tissues and their morphological changes during drying - A review

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
卷 194, 期 -, 页码 24-39

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.09.002

关键词

Food drying; Mathematical modelling; Meshfree methods; Numerical modelling and simulation; Plant cells and tissues

资金

  1. Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  2. Chemistry, Physics and Mechanical Engineering (CPME) scholarship by the Science and Engineering Faculty (SEF), QUT
  3. University of Moratuwa, Sri Lanka

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Food engineers and researchers have been making numerous attempts to mathematically model and simulate the underlying mechanisms of plant food drying in order to optimise the process efficiency and product quality. Numerical modelling has been widely used for this purpose because it reduces time and improves resource efficiency compared to real world experimentation. Different grid based methods have been conventionally used for this purpose despite their significant limitations particularly when encountered with large deformations and multiphase phenomena. As an alternative, meshfree methods have been gaining popularity because of their unique abilities in handling such complicated physics. In this background, this application could be used to assess the capabilities of meshfree methods as it involves large deformations, extreme moisture content variations as well as multiphase phenomena. This article reviews the current developments of meshfree approaches which model and simulate plant cellular systems and their morphological changes during drying. It could be concluded that meshfree methods have unique advantages especially in terms of performance and versatility in this regard and there are potential future work in the areas of accommodating temperature variations, 3-D modelling and multiscale modelling. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据