4.6 Article

Characterisation and chemometric evaluation of 21 trace elements in three edible seaweed species imported from south-east Asia

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 188-197

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2017.09.004

关键词

Food analysis; Food composition; Seaweed; Trace elements; Heavy metals; Inductively-coupled plasma; Mass spectrometry; Food safety

资金

  1. Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Puglia e della Basilicata (Foggia, Italy)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study was performed to delineate a characterisation of 21 trace elements (Al, As, Be, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Hg, Mo, Mn, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, Sn, Sr, Tl, U, V, and Zn), in 92 samples of edible seaweeds, belonging to three species (Laminaria Japonica, 16; Porphyra Yezoensis, 54; Undaria Pinnatifida, 22) produced in south-eastern Asiatic countries. Analytical method based on inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry was used. The compliance of samples with current European regulations was investigated and the 26% of samples was found not-compliant for Cd level. The suitability of the method due to multi-elemental determination allowed a multivariate approach to study the differentiation between species and to investigate the contribution of each element in differentiation. Influence of the geographical origin onto trace element profile was evaluated, and correlation study between each pair of elements was performed by Pearson coefficients. Taxonomic genus and, although to a lesser extent, the geographic origin have a great influence on trace element profile. Comparison with other similar studies was also performed. Discussion on safety aspects concerning heavy metal exposure related to seaweed consumption has been addressed, by comparing the tolerable levels of the most important toxic elements and the intake brought by seaweed species. For some toxic metals, such as Al and Cd, a remarkable risk related to seaweed consumption has been assessed, though with differences between species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据