4.2 Article

Case study approach to modeling historical disinfection by-product exposure in Iowa drinking waters

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 183-190

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2017.03.007

关键词

Disinfection by-products; Trihalomethanes; Haloacetic acids; Exposure assessment; Epidemiology; Bladder cancer

资金

  1. Water Research Foundation
  2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
  3. Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics of the National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  4. CHEEC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the 1980s, a case-control epidemiologic study was conducted in Iowa (USA) to analyze the association between exposure to disinfection by-products (DBPs) and bladder cancer risk. Trihalomethanes (THMs), the most commonly measured and dominant class of DBPs in drinking water, served as a primary metric and surrogate for the full DBP mixture. Average THM exposure was calculated, based on rough estimates of past levels in Iowa. To reduce misclassification, a follow-up study was undertaken to improve estimates of past THM levels and to re-evaluate their association with cancer risk. In addition, the risk associated with haloacetic acids, another class of DBPs, was examined. In the original analysis, surface water treatment plants were assigned one of two possible THM levels depending on the point of chlorination. The re-assessment considered each utility treating surface or groundwater on a case-by-case basis. Multiple treatment/disinfection scenarios and water quality parameters were considered with actual DBP measurements to develop estimates of past levels. The highest annual average THM level in the re-analysis was 156 mu g/L compared to 74 mu g/L for the original analysis. This allowed the analysis of subjects exposed at higher levels (>96 mu g/L). The re-analysis established a new approach, based on case studies and an understanding of the water quality and operational parameters that impact DBP formation, for determining historical exposure. (C) 2017 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据