4.5 Article

Does micropollutant removal by solar photo-Fenton reduce ecotoxicity in municipal wastewater? A comprehensive study at pilot scale open reactors

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.5212

关键词

sequential iron dosage; Fe(III)-EDDS; endocrine disruptors; cytotoxicity; phytotoxicity

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTQ2013-46398-R]
  2. Andalusian Government [P10-RNM-05951]
  3. European Regional Development Fund
  4. Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [LO1214, LM2015051]
  5. Andalusian Government
  6. COST-Action [ES1403]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND: The reduction of toxicity in secondary effluents by solar photo-Fenton has not been widely studied. In this present work, a strategy combining monitoring of micropollutants and application of a selected battery of bioassays has been applied to evaluate the effectiveness of the solar photo-Fenton process for secondary effluent treatment at neutral pH in a raceway pond reactor (RPR) following two operating strategies: sequential iron dosage and the use of Fe(III)-EDDS complex at pilotplant scale. The applied battery of bioassays comprises in vivo(algal growth inhibition test) and in vitro, endocrine disruptor tests (androgenic/glucocorticoid activity and estrogenicity) and cytotoxicity tests. RESULTS: The results obtained revealed high efficiency of micropollutant removal (>99%) by both strategies assayed. Regarding toxicity, androgenic/glucocorticoid activity and estrogenicity were efficiently removed in a similar fashion, and the relatively low potential phytotoxicity and cytotoxicity was also attenuated. Both RPR strategies are able to enhance the quality of municipal effluents from chemical and toxicological points of view. CONCLUSION: To enable water reuse, the feasibility of solar photo-Fenton reaction at neutral pH in open reactors for ecotoxicity and micropollutant removal in secondary municipal wastewater has been demonstrated for the first time. (c) 2017 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据