4.6 Article

Have an eye on the buckled cucumber: An eye tracking study on visually suboptimal foods

期刊

FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE
卷 60, 期 -, 页码 40-47

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.03.009

关键词

Eye tracking; Visually suboptimal food; Sustainability; Consumers; Visual attention

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Bonn, Germany [2814ERA02B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Waste is an ever growing problem in the food supply chain, starting in the production up to the consumers' households. A precondition for a consumer to purchase a product is to recognize it as an option in the first place. Therefore, in the present study, we investigated eye movement behavior on impeccable and visually suboptimal food items in a purchase or discard decision task. Additionally, in some trials price badges of the suboptimal food items were designed specifically in order to attract attention. Design changes included messages regarding price and taste, respectively, either presented in red or green. The results show that the design changes indeed attracted attention towards suboptimal food items in terms of time to first fixation, and also prolonged total fixation duration. However, only color yielded differences between the design variations, with red resulting in longer total fixation durations. Additionally, we inspected choice behavior towards visually suboptimal food items. As can be expected, purchase decisions declined for the suboptimal as compared to the impeccable items. However, when presented with differently designed price badges, a positive trend to purchase the suboptimal items was obtained. Our results show that price badge designs impact attention, cognitive processing, and finally also purchase decisions. Therefore, supplying visually suboptimal food in stores should be embedded into efforts to attract attention towards these products, as selling visually suboptimal food might positively impact waste balance in the food domain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据