4.7 Article

Characterization of Enterococcus durans 152 bacteriocins and their inhibition of Listeria monocytogenes in ham

期刊

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 68, 期 -, 页码 97-103

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2017.07.002

关键词

Bacteriocins; Enterococcus durans; Listeria monocytogenes; Ready-to-eat meat

资金

  1. National Key Technology Support Program [2015BAD16B04]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20151550]
  3. Jiangsu Province Science and Technology [BE2014711]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  5. Scholarship Council of Nanjing University of Finance Economics
  6. US Agriculture and Food Research Initiative from USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [2011-68003-30012]
  7. Center for Food Safety, University of Georgia.
  8. NIFA [688750, 2011-68003-30012] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

' Listeria monocytogenes is a nonfastidious, widely occurring foodborne pathogen that is a major challenge to the food industry. Enterococcus durans 152, a confirmed L. monocytogenes-control microorganism, was isolated from floor drain samples from a food processing facility. In this study, the two bacteriocins produced by E. durans 152 were characterized and identified as Dur 152A (an enterocin L50A derivative with two amino acid substitutions of I -> M) and enterocin L50B. The bacteriocins were then partially purified and evaluated for inhibitory activity to L. monocytogenes in deli ham. Results revealed that at 400 AU/ml, the bacteriocins prevented growth of listeria in deli ham for at least 10 weeks at 8 degrees C and at least 30 days at 15 degrees C. For comparison, 500 ppm Nisin controlled listeria growth for up to 6 weeks at 8 degrees C and up to 18 days at 15 degrees C. These findings reveal the potential for the bacteriocins of E. durans 152 to serve as anti-listerial agents in deli meat. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据