4.7 Article

Simulation of phytoplankton distribution and variation in the Bering-Chukchi Sea using a 3-D physical-biological model

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS
卷 121, 期 6, 页码 4041-4055

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2016JC011692

关键词

-

资金

  1. NOAA RUSALCA (Russian-American Long-term Censes of the Arctic) International Polar Year modeling project
  2. NASA interdisciplinary Science Award [NNX11AP28G]
  3. NASA [NNX11AP28G, 139327] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A three-dimensional physical-biological model has been used to simulate seasonal phytoplankton variations in the Bering and Chukchi Seas with a focus on understanding the physical and biogeochemical mechanisms involved in the formation of the Bering Sea Green Belt (GB) and the Subsurface Chlorophyll Maxima (SCM). Model results suggest that the horizontal distribution of the GB is controlled by a combination of light, temperature, and nutrients. Model results indicated that the SCM, frequently seen below the thermocline, exists because of a rich supply of nutrients and sufficient light. The seasonal onset of phytoplankton blooms is controlled by different factors at different locations in the Bering-Chukchi Sea. In the off-shelf central region of the Bering Sea, phytoplankton blooms are regulated by available light. On the Bering Sea shelf, sea ice through its influence on light and temperature plays a key role in the formation of blooms, whereas in the Chukchi Sea, bloom formation is largely controlled by ambient seawater temperatures. A numerical experiment conducted as part of this study revealed that plankton sinking is important for simulating the vertical distribution of phytoplankton and the seasonal formation of the SCM. An additional numerical experiment revealed that sea ice algae account for 14.3-36.9% of total phytoplankton production during the melting season, and it cannot be ignored when evaluating primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据