4.4 Article

Supervisory control theory applied to swarm robotics

期刊

SWARM INTELLIGENCE
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 65-97

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11721-016-0119-0

关键词

Supervisory control theory; Swarm robotics; Formal methods; Kilobot; e-puck; Automatic code generation

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J013714/1, EP/K031600/1]
  2. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES)-Brazil [0462/12-8]
  3. DOC Fellowship of Austrian Academy of Sciences
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K031600/1, EP/J013714/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/J013714/1, EP/K031600/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Currently, the control software of swarm robotics systems is created by ad hoc development. This makes it hard to deploy these systems in real-world scenarios. In particular, it is difficult to maintain, analyse, or verify the systems. Formal methods can contribute to overcome these problems. However, they usually do not guarantee that the implementation matches the specification, because the system's control code is typically generated manually. Also, there is cultural resistance to apply formal methods; they may be perceived as an additional step that does not add value to the final product. To address these problems, we propose supervisory control theory for the domain of swarm robotics. The advantages of supervisory control theory, and its associated tools, are a reduction in the amount of ad hoc development, the automatic generation of control code from modelled specifications, proofs of properties over generated control code, and the reusability of formally designed controllers between different robotic platforms. These advantages are demonstrated in four case studies using the e-puck and Kilobot robot platforms. Experiments with up to 600 physical robots are reported, which show that supervisory control theory can be used to formally develop state-of-the-art solutions to a range of problems in swarm robotics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据