4.8 Article

The T300A Crohn's disease risk polymorphism impairs function of the WD40 domain of ATG16L1

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 7, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11821

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion of the Spanish Government [SAF2011-23714]
  2. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of the Spanish Government [SAF2014-53320-R]
  3. Broad Medical Research Program at Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA) [IBD-0369]
  4. Junta de Castilla y Leon local government (Department of Education) [CSI001A10-2, FIC016U14]
  5. Junta de Castilla y Leon local government (Department of Health) [SAN11-FXP]
  6. Fundacion Solorzano [FS/1-2009, FS/18-2014]
  7. NIH [R01DK097485, P30DK043351, U19AI109725]
  8. Helmsley Trust
  9. FEDER programme of the European Union
  10. FPU programme (Ministerio de Educacion, MEC, Spanish Government)
  11. Fundacion Moraza

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A coding polymorphism of human ATG16L1 (rs2241880; T300A) increases the risk of Crohn's disease and it has been shown to enhance susceptibility of ATG16L1 to caspase cleavage. Here we show that T300A also alters the ability of the C-terminal WD40-repeat domain of ATG16L1 to interact with an amino acid motif that recognizes this region. Such alteration impairs the unconventional autophagic activity of TMEM59, a transmembrane protein that contains the WD40 domain-binding motif, and disrupts its normal intracellular trafficking and its ability to engage ATG16L1 in response to bacterial infection. TMEM59-induced autophagy is blunted in cells expressing the fragments generated by caspase processing of the ATG16L1-T300A risk allele, whereas canonical autophagy remains unaffected. These results suggest that the T300A polymorphism alters the function of motif-containing molecules that engage ATG16L1 through the WD40 domain, either by influencing this interaction under non-stressful conditions or by inhibiting their downstream autophagic signalling after caspase-mediated cleavage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据