4.5 Article

Low Cost Compact Nanosecond Pulsed Plasma System for Environmental and Biomedical Applications

期刊

PLASMA CHEMISTRY AND PLASMA PROCESSING
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 59-76

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11090-016-9747-9

关键词

Cockcroft-Walton voltage multiplier; Nanosecond pulsed power; Non-thermal plasma; Ozone synthesis; Energy efficiency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanosecond pulsed non-thermal atmospheric-pressure plasmas are promising for numerous applications including air and water purification, ozone synthesis, surface sterilization, material processing, and biomedical care. However, the high cost of the nanosecond pulsed power sources has hindered adaptation of the plasma-based technologies for clinical and industrial use. This paper presents a low cost (< 100US$) nanosecond pulsed plasma system that consists of a Cockcroft-Walton high voltage charging circuit, a compact nanosecond pulse generator using a spark gap as switch, and a plasma reactor. The nanosecond pulse power source requires only a 12 V DC input, hence is battery operable. Through the optimization of the experimental parameters, pulses with a peak voltage > 10 kV, a 3 ns rise time (10 to 90 %), and a 10 ns pulse duration (full width at half maximum) at a pulse repetition rate of up to 500 Hz were achieved in the present study. It has been successfully tested to power three different plasma reactors to form pulsed corona discharges, dielectric barrier discharges, and sliding discharges. The energy efficiency of such a nanosecond pulsed sliding discharge system was assessed in the context of ozone synthesis using air or oxygen as the feed gas, and was found comparable to a previously reported non-thermal plasma system that used commercial high voltage pulsed power sources. This study demonstrated that this low-cost nanosecond pulsed power source can prove to be an energy efficient and simple supply to drive various non-thermal atmospheric-pressure plasma reactors for environmental, medical and other applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据