How to motivate a reviewer with a present bias to work harder

The cross-subsidy and buy-one-give-one models of compensated peer review: A comparative study for mission-driven journals

(2022) Jose A García et al.   JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE

Can a paid model for peer review be sustainable when the author can decide whether to pay or not?

(2021) J. A. García et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

Self-efficacy, procrastination, and burnout in post-secondary faculty: An international longitudinal analysis

(2019) Nathan C. Hall et al.   PLoS One

The peer review game: an agent-based model of scientists facing resource constraints and institutional pressures

(2018) Federico Bianchi et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

On the money value of peer review

(2018) Sergio Copiello   SCIENTOMETRICS

Are non-monetary rewards effective in attracting peer reviewers? A natural experiment

(2018) Monica Aniela Zaharie et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

Scientometrics of peer review

(2017) Flaminio Squazzoni et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

Does single blind peer review hinder newcomers?

(2017) Marco Seeber et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

Inter-rater reliability and validity of peer reviews in an interdisciplinary field

(2017) Jens Jirschitzka et al.   SCIENTOMETRICS

Attitudes of referees in a multidisciplinary journal: An empirical analysis

(2016) Niccolò Casnici et al.   Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

The principal-agent problem in peer review

(2014) Jose A. García et al.   Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Scientific peer review

(2013) Lutz Bornmann   ANNUAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

Bias in peer review

(2012) Carole J. Lee et al.   JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY