4.7 Article

Sulforaphane induces adipocyte browning and promotes glucose and lipid utilization

期刊

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
卷 60, 期 10, 页码 2185-2197

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201500915

关键词

Adipocyte browning; Glucose metabolism; Lipid metabolism; Mitochondria; Sulforaphane

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81172660, 81450048]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation [LY14H260001]
  3. Ningbo Civil Outstanding Talent and Leadership Fund
  4. K. C. Wong Magna Fund at Ningbo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scope: Obesity is closely related to the imbalance of white adipose tissue storing excess calories, and brown adipose tissue dissipating energy to produce heat in mammals. Recent studies revealed that acquisition of brown characteristics by white adipocytes, termed browning, may positively contribute to cellular bioenergetics and metabolism homeostasis. The goal was to investigate the putative effects of natural antioxidant sulforaphane (1-isothiocyanate-4-methylsulfonyl butane; SFN) on browning of white adipocytes. Methods and results: 3T3-L1 mature white adipocytes were treated with SFN for 48 h, and then the mitochondrial content, function, and energy utilization were assessed. SFN was found to induce 3T3-L1 adipocytes browning based on the increased mitochondrial content and activity of respiratory chain enzymes, whereas the mechanism involved the upregulation of nuclear factor E2-related factor 2/sirtuin1/peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha signaling. SFN enhanced uncoupling protein 1 expression, a marker for brown adipocyte, leading to the decrease in cellular ATP. SFN also enhanced glucose uptake and oxidative utilization, lipolysis, and fatty acid oxidation in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Conclusion: SFN-induced browning of white adipocytes enhanced the utilization of cellular fuel, and application of SFN is a promising strategy to combat obesity and obesity-related metabolic disorder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据