4.7 Article

Comparative analysis of low-frequency noise based resistive switching phenomenon for filamentary and interfacial RRAM devices

期刊

CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS
卷 173, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113633

关键词

RRAM; Resistive switching; Filamentary RRAM; Interfacial RRAM; Multi level cell; Low; frequency noise

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the LFN characteristics of filamentary and interfacial RRAM devices and proposed guidelines for noise sources based on resistance states and switching mechanisms. In filamentary devices, localized oxygen vacancies were identified as the dominant noise source in the low resistance state, while the noise in the high resistance state represented a bulk effect. In interfacial devices, noise characteristics in both resistance states represented the bulk effect. Furthermore, LFN measurements confirmed changes in the conductive filament structure during multilevel cell operation.
We investigate the low-frequency noise (LFN) characteristics of resistive switching random access memory (RRAM) devices with metal-insulator-metal structures of TiN/Ti/TiO2/TiN (filamentary) and TiN/Ti/TiO2/ HfO2/TiN (interfacial). By comparing filamentary and interfacial RRAM devices, we stipulate guidelines for noise sources according to the resistance states or resistive switching mechanisms of RRAM device. In filamentary RRAM devices, the dominant noise source in the low resistance state is the localized oxygen vacancies, whereas the noise characteristics in the high resistance state represent a bulk effect. In interfacial RRAM devices, the noise characteristics in both resistance states represent the bulk effect. The physical mechanism of the multilevel cell operation is inferred by the I-V characteristics in both Icc and Vreset control modes. Specifically, the changes in the structure of the conductive filament inside the switching layer can be confirmed through LFN measurement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据