4.6 Article

A Model of Text for Experimentation in the Social Sciences

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
卷 111, 期 515, 页码 988-1003

出版社

AMER STATISTICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2016.1141684

关键词

Causal inference; Experimentation; High-dimensional inference; Social sciences; Text analysis; Variational approximation

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development [P2-CHD047879]
  2. National Science Foundation [IIS-1149662, IIS-1409177]
  3. Office of Naval Research [YIP N00014-14-1-0485]
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  5. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1409177] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Statistical models of text have become increasingly popular in statistics and computer science as a method of exploring large document collections. Social scientists often want to move beyond exploration, to measurement and experimentation, and make inference about social and political processes that drive discourse and content. In this article, we develop a model of text data that supports this type of substantive research. Our approach is to posit a hierarchical mixed membership model for analyzing topical content of documents, in which mixing weights are parameterized by observed covariates. In this model, topical prevalence and topical content are specified as a simple generalized linear model on an arbitrary number of document level covariates, such as news source and time of release, enabling researchers to introduce elements of the experimental design that informed document collection into the model, within a generally applicable framework. We demonstrate the proposed methodology by analyzing a collection of news reports about China, where we allow the prevalence of topics to evolve over time and vary across newswire services. Our methods quantify the effect of news wire source on both the frequency and nature of topic coverage. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据