4.6 Article

Manufacturing and evaluation of polyurethane composite structural insulated panels

期刊

JOURNAL OF SANDWICH STRUCTURES & MATERIALS
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 769-789

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1099636215626597

关键词

Thermoset polyurethane; composite structural insulation panels; vacuum assisted resin transfer molding; building and energy consumption; finite element simulation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Composite materials are increasingly used in applications of civil infrastructure and building materials. The new generations of two-part thermoset polyurethane resin systems are desirable materials for infrastructure applications. This is due to high impact resistance, superior mechanical properties, and reduced volatile organic compounds when compared to the conventionally used resin systems such as vinyl ester and polyester. Glass fiber-reinforced two-part polyurethane composites and low-density polyurethane foam are used to design and manufacture composite structural insulation panels using vacuum assisted resin transfer molding process for temporary housing applications. Using these types of composite panels in building construction will result in cost-efficient, high-performance products due to inherent advantages in design flexibility. Use of core-filled composite structures offers additional benefits such as high strength, stiffness, lower structural weight, ease of installation and structure replacement, and higher buckling resistance than the conventional panels. Energy efficiency is known to be inherently better with the core-filled composite panel than in a metallic material. The panels can be designed to resist the required loads, and the study aims to evaluate the ability of lab scale tests and models to predict part quality in full-scale parts. Furthermore, it discusses the manufacturing challenges. Flexural tests and energy consumption evaluations were performed on these structural components. Finite element simulation results were used to validate the flexural experiment findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据