The influence of sociodemographic factors and response style on caregiver report of infant developmental status
出版年份 2023 全文链接
标题
The influence of sociodemographic factors and response style on caregiver report of infant developmental status
作者
关键词
-
出版物
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Volume 10, Issue -, Pages -
出版商
Frontiers Media SA
发表日期
2023-01-11
DOI
10.3389/fped.2022.1080163
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Evidence-Informed Milestones for Developmental Surveillance Tools
- (2022) Jennifer M. Zubler et al. PEDIATRICS
- Capturing the complexity of autism: Applying a developmental cascades framework
- (2022) Jessica Bradshaw et al. Child Development Perspectives
- Assessing Negative Response Bias Using Self-Report Measures: New Articles, New Issues
- (2022) Luciano Giromini et al. Psychological Injury & Law
- Caregiver rating of early childhood development: Reliability and validity of the ASQ-3 in rural Guatemala
- (2021) Alison M. Colbert et al. EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
- PediaTrac V.3.0 protocol: a prospective, longitudinal study of the development and validation of a web-based tool to measure and track infant and toddler development from birth through 18 months
- (2021) Renee Lajiness-O'Neill et al. BMJ Open
- Acceptability and understanding of the ASQ-3TM as part of the healthy child programme two-year health and development review in England: Parent and professional perspectives
- (2019) S. Kendall et al. CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT
- Concurrent validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire and the Bayley Scales of Infant Development III in China
- (2019) Ai Yue et al. PLoS One
- Promoting Optimal Development: Identifying Infants and Young Children With Developmental Disorders Through Developmental Surveillance and Screening
- (2019) Paul H. Lipkin et al. PEDIATRICS
- Neurodevelopmental delay: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data
- (2019) Adrienne N. Villagomez et al. VACCINE
- Assessment of health surveys: fitting a multidimensional graded response model
- (2018) Sarah Depaoli et al. Psychology Health & Medicine
- Responding to the Zika Epidemic: Preparation of a Neurodevelopmental Testing Protocol to Evaluate Young Children in Rural Guatemala
- (2018) Amy Connery et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE
- Aggregating validity indicators: The salience of domain specificity and the indeterminate range in multivariate models of performance validity assessment
- (2017) Laszlo A. Erdodi Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
- Use of the ages and stages questionnaire adapted for South Africa and Zambia
- (2016) C. Hsiao et al. CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT
- Validation of a culturally adapted developmental screening tool for Australian Aboriginal children: Early findings and next steps
- (2016) Samantha Simpson et al. EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
- Validation of the Chilean version of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-CL) in Community Health Settings
- (2015) Iván Armijo et al. EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
- Screening for Speech and Language Delay and Disorders in Children Aged 5 Years or Younger: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
- (2015) A. L. Siu et al. PEDIATRICS
- Caring for children with physical disability in Kenya: potential links between caregiving and carers' physical health
- (2012) J. L. Geere et al. CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT
- Ages and stages questionnaire as a screening tool for developmental delay in Indian children
- (2012) Monica Juneja et al. INDIAN PEDIATRICS
- A Note on the Relation Between Factor Analytic and Item Response Theory Models
- (2011) Akihito Kamata et al. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL
- Investing in early human development: Timing and economic efficiency
- (2009) Orla Doyle et al. Economics & Human Biology
- Prevalence of Developmental Delays and Participation in Early Intervention Services for Young Children
- (2008) S. A. Rosenberg et al. PEDIATRICS
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started