Frontiers in Pediatrics

期刊名
Frontiers in Pediatrics

FRONT PEDIATR

ISSN / eISSN
2296-2360 / 2296-2360
目标和范围
Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.

Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.
研究方向

儿科

CiteScore
3.30 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Medicine - Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health Q2 #112/306
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
PEDIATRICS - SCIE Q2
H-index
3
出版国家或地区
SWITZERLAND
出版商
Frontiers Media S.A.
年文章数
2287
Open Access
YES
通讯方式
AVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND, CH-1015
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
Submit to acceptance within 2-3 months, with 2 rounds of revisions. The first round of revisions is moderate, while the second round is minor. Each round allows for 10 days, with the option to request an extension. If we rush, as long as our response is prompt (our first response took a full 10 days, while the second round of minor revisions took 1 day), the reviewers and editors reply promptly, sometimes within 2-3 days, although it could also be due to good luck. The reviewer's comments are also fair and constructive, not simply rejecting the paper with a single comment about lack of innovation, but rather providing thoughtful suggestions for improvement, making the research more rigorous and suitable for publication, similar to the suggestions made during internal meetings. When we first submitted, we carefully selected recommended reviewers, not necessarily well-known experts, as they are usually busy and might ignore such emails. Instead, we chose reviewers who have published extensively on our research topic and are more relevant as first authors or corresponding authors. However, the editor did not use our recommendations and chose reviewers independently. In conclusion, when submitting a paper, try to fill in all the optional fields with sincerity.
2021-10-17
The submission was made on June 12th, and the editor quickly acknowledged it. Then it was sent for review, with a total of three reviewers. The first reviewer promptly responded with their opinions and agreed to publish it. The second reviewer took around two weeks to provide feedback and allowed ten days for revisions. The forum responses were timely and the suggestions given were constructive. Finally, the third reviewer presented their opinions and agreed to publish. After all three reviewers agreed, the editor provided further revision suggestions, which were made and accepted. The process from submission to acceptance took approximately 1.5 months, which was quite fast.
2022-01-19

Publish scientific posters with Peeref

Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.

Learn More

Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript

Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.

Search