4.6 Article

Quantitative Assessment of Natural Ventilation in an Elementary School Classroom in the Context of COVID-19 and Its Impact in Airborne Transmission

期刊

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
卷 12, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app12189261

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; ventilation rate; airborne transmission; Wells-Riley; natural ventilation

资金

  1. Unidad de Extension of the Facultad de Ingenieria, Universidad de la Republica

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper studies the indoor air quality of a naturally ventilated elementary school classroom, measures parameters such as carbon dioxide concentration, and assesses the airborne risk of SARS-CoV-2 through simulations. The study finds that periodic ventilation significantly reduces the risk, especially in naturally ventilated environments in cold weathers.
The importance of Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) has been highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly due to the possibility of long-distance airborne transmission. Consequently, assessment of ventilation rates and estimation of infection risk has become a matter of the utmost importance. In this paper, a naturally ventilated elementary school classroom is studied, where carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations were measured during five months. Ventilation rates are calculated via a fully-mixed box model and the airborne risk of infection for SARS-CoV-2 is assessed. Risk results are found to steadily decline from winter to spring. Furthermore, analytical simulations for different scenarios are conducted. It is shown that periodic ventilation significantly reduces the transmission risk, even if it occurs only during very reduced time spans. The results show that periodic ventilation is a useful strategy for reducing the risk of any airborne transmitted disease. It is particularly well-suited for naturally ventilated environments in cold weathers, as it allows for a compromise between IAQ and thermal comfort, and does not require any modification to existing buildings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据