4.7 Article

Effect of the manufacturing parameters on the tensile and fracture properties of FDM 3D-printed PLA specimens

期刊

ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS
卷 274, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2022.108766

关键词

FDM technique process parameters; Tensile properties; mode I and II fracture toughness; Crack paths

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the influence of manufacturing parameters on the tensile and fracture properties of PLA elements obtained by FDM technology. The results show that the performance of FDM 3D-printed PLA specimens is dependent on the manufacturing parameters.
Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM), also known as material extrusion, is currently one of the most popular Additive Manufacturing (AM) technology on the market. In this study, two commercial FDM printers (Prusa i3 MK3 and WN400 3D Platform) were used for layer-by-layer manufacturing of polylactic acid (PLA) Dog Bone (DB) and Single Edge Notched Bend (SENB) specimens, aimed at investigating the influence of the manufacturing parameters on the tensile and fracture properties of PLA elements obtained by FDM technology. The effects of growing direction (horizontal and vertical), building orientation (0???, 45??? and 90???), printer type, layer thickness (0.15 and 0.40 mm), specimen thickness (4 and 10 mm) and filament color (purple, white, black, gray, red, orange) are discussed in detail. Tensile tests were performed on DB specimens, while fracture mechanics tests on SENB specimens. Both the tensile and fracture properties of FDM 3D-printed PLA specimens have been found to be dependent on the investi-gated manufacturing parameters. From the microstructural analyses of the SENB fracture sur-faces, it has been observed that the fracture mechanisms and crack propagation is a step-wise process. Finally, the material properties charts (Young???s modulus and mode I fracture toughness versus tensile strength) are plotted. Superscript/Subscript Available

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据