4.7 Article

Ultrasonic disruption effects on the extraction efficiency, characterization, and bioactivities of polysaccharides from Panax notoginseng flower

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 291, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119535

关键词

Ultrasonic disruption extraction; Panax notoginseng flower; Polysaccharide; Physicochemical characteristic; Functional property; Biological activity

资金

  1. Natural Science Joint Foundation free exploration key project of Jilin Province [YDZJ202101ZYTS183]
  2. Research Fund project of Changchun Normal University [2019014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrasonic disruption extraction (UDE) was found to effectively improve the yield, water solubility, and water holding capacity of Panax notoginseng flower polysaccharides (PNFPs), while reducing their molecular weight and protein content.
Ultrasonic disruption extraction (UDE) and heat reflux extraction (HRE) were used to extract polysaccharides (PNFPs) from Panax notoginseng flower, and the yield, physicochemical characteristics, structural characteristics, functional properties and biological activities were evaluated and compared. Results indicated that UDE changed the above properties of PNFPs. Compared with HRE (H-PNFPs), the yields, uronic acid contents, total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, water-solubility, water holding capacity, and oil holding capacity of the polysaccharides (U-PNFPs) extracted by UDE increased by 48.63%, 47.36%, 39.98%, 7.41%, 2.26%, 15.56%, and 1.34%, respectively. In comparison, the molecular weight and protein content decreased by 43.53% and 16.46%. Results demonstrate that UDE could effectively improve the physicochemical and functional properties, and bioactivities. These findings are helpful for better understanding the relationship between the physicochemical properties and bioactivities of U-PNFPs, especially U-PNFP-2 exhibited the most significant antioxidant activity, which can prevent oxidative stress, applications in food and pharmaceutical industries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据