4.6 Article

Enhancing protease activity of Bacillus subtilis using UV-laser random mutagenesis and high-throughput screening

期刊

PROCESS BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 119, 期 -, 页码 119-127

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2022.05.018

关键词

Mutagenesis; Protease activity; Bacillus subtilis; Fermentation

资金

  1. Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program (Key Project of Modern Agriculture) [BE2018368]
  2. Technology Innovation Guidance Project-Science and Technology Work Conference of Hebei Provincial Department of Science and Technology, China
  3. Science and Technology Project of Hebei Education Department, China [BJ2019046]
  4. Hebei Key Laboratory of Nerve Injury and Repair (China)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully screened two mutant strains with high protease activity through UV-laser random mutagenesis and high-throughput screening methods. These mutant strains showed good effects in increasing peptide content in fermented soybean meal.
Increasing the peptide level of fermented soybean meal helps improve its nutritional value, so it is necessary to screen strains with high protease activity. In this study, UV-laser random mutagenesis was employed to treat Bacillus subtilis for the selection of high protease producers. A high-throughput screening (HTS) processed aided by a microtiter plate (MTP) was established to enhance the efficiency of screening. Five mutagenesis methods were employed to investigate the mutagenesis effect, among which the positive mutation rate was the highest in laser UV sequential mutation (LA-UV). Two mutants, UV-1-84 and LA-UV-1-11, were re-screened from 32 positive mutants, exhibiting excellent genetic stability and protease activity. Besides, fermented soybean meal test showed that peptide content of SBM fermented by mutants UV-1-84 and LA-UV-1-11 increased by 13.66% and 12.91% respectively, compared with the wild-type strain. The HTS process established in this study could be easily transferred to other similar high-yield strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据