4.7 Article

Nanoscale precipitates with quasicrystal domains enhanced strength-ductility synergy in a Mg-6Zn-4Al-1Sn-0.5Mn alloy

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2022.143425

关键词

Mg alloy; Precipitation strengthening; Quasicrystalline; Double-aging; HAADF-STEM

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52171021, 51871222, 51801214]
  2. Young Talent Project by SYNL
  3. Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2019 -MS -335]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By extrusion and double aging, homogenous nanosized precipitates were introduced into a Mg alloy, leading to improved strength and ductility. The study identified two types of nanoprecipitates and revealed their contributions to the alloy properties.
Precipitation strengthening is one of the significant strengthening mechanisms for metallic alloys owing to its excellent strengthening effect. Here, we effectively introduce homogenous nanosized precipitates into a Mg-6Zn-4Al-1Sn-0.5Mn (wt.%) alloy via extrusion and double aging to enhance strength-ductility synergy. The yield strength, ultimate tensile strength, and total elongation of the Mg alloy are 303.1 +/- 15.8 MPa, 392.5 +/- 3.9 MPa, and 21.1 +/- 2.4%, respectively. Using transmission electron microscopy and atomic level high angle annual dark field-scanning TEM, in addition to the icosahedral quasicrystalline (IQC) particles at the grain boundary, we find that there are two kinds of nanoprecipitates in the matrix. The majority of nanoprecipitates are cuboid IQC phases with nanodomains parallel to the basal plane of the Mg matrix, while the minority of nanoprecipitates are rod-like beta(1)' phases containing IQC clusters vertical to the basal plane. These homogenous nanoscale precipitates and grain refinement contribute 50.5% and 30.2% of the yield strength. This work sheds new light on understanding the nanoscale IQC precipitate strengthening mechanisms of magnesium alloys and provides a novel method to fabricate alloys with superior mechanical properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据