4.7 Article

Multi-element and stable isotopes characterization of commercial avocado fruit (Persea americana Mill) with origin authentication purposes

期刊

FOOD CONTROL
卷 137, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.108975

关键词

IRMS; ICP-MS; Stable isotopes; Traceability; Chemometrics; Avocado

资金

  1. Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training (IFAPA), within the National Youth Guarantee System funded through the European Social Fund (ESF)
  2. Youth Employment Initiative (YEI)
  3. Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training (IFAPA)
  4. European Rural Development Fund (ERDF, EU) [PR.AVA.AVA201601.20]
  5. Accordo di Programma 2018-2019, Traceability unit of Fondazione Edmund Mach

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully differentiated avocados from different origins by analyzing stable isotope and elemental composition profiles, revealing the potential of these features in tracing the geographical origin of avocados.
Avocado (Persea americana Mill) is a fruit consumed worldwide due to its valuable organoleptic and health-promoting properties. To date, no information is available about the isotopic composition of this foodstuff and this study determines the stable isotope composition of five bio-elements (C, N, S, H and O) and the composition profile of 46 macro, micro and trace elements. The stable isotope and elemental profiles were determined in 131 avocados from different producing regions (Spain, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Kenya, Mexico, Peru, South Africa) collected over three years to study the main geographical differences. A PLS-DA model was performed combining the stable isotopes with the elemental profile, making it possible to distinguish the Spanish from the non-Spanish avocados with a high prediction accuracy (98% correct classification). The results of this study highlight the potential of stable isotope ratios and elemental profiles for tracing the geographical origin of avocados.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据