4.5 Article

Vegetation composition and structure changes following roller-chopping deforestation in central Argentina woodlands

期刊

JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS
卷 133, 期 -, 页码 19-24

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2016.05.005

关键词

Argentina woodlands; Ecosystem phenology; Functional group diversity; NDVI; Roller-chopping

资金

  1. Argentina National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA)
  2. Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research [IAI CRN II 2031]
  3. National Science Foundation [CRN III 3095]
  4. International Development Research Center (IDRC, Canada) [106601-001]
  5. CONICET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Driven by the pressure of increasing forage production, dry forests and woodlands of Argentina are suffering one of the highest deforestation rates in the world. In this study we combined field work and a remote sensing approach to assess the successional trajectory in terms of functional group diversity and ecosystem phenology, following roller chopping deforestation in a woodland of central Argentina. The first year after disturbance, shrub cover decreased at the same proportion than grass cover increased while tree cover was drastically reduced. After 3 years, shrubs recovered 70% of the original cover and grasses maintained a relatively high proportion, but tree cover remained low. Roller-chopping favoured early over late successional species in the case of woody plants, but had the inverse effect in the case of grasses. At ecosystem scale the length of the growing season was drastically shortened by 100 days following disturbance. Roller chopping improves ecosystem services of provision by enhancing forage's offer but at the same time deteriorated the system by reducing functional plant diversity and by shortening the growing season, with potential cascade-consequences on other ecosystem processes such as the carbon and water dynamics. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据