Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Seyedeh Sahar Taheri Otaghsara, Tim Joda, Florian Markus Thieringer
Summary: This in-vitro study compared the accuracy of implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) at two implant sites. The results showed that both static and dynamic CAIS resulted in accurate implant placement. However, dynamic CAIS exhibited higher deviation in the mesial direction in an in-vitro setting. Additionally, the accuracy of both CAIS approaches was affected by the implant site.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
(2023)
Review
Medicine, General & Internal
Sigmar Schnutenhaus, Cornelia Edelmann, Anne Knipper, Ralph G. Luthardt
Summary: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to analyze the accuracy of implant placement using computer-assisted dynamic navigation procedures. The results showed that the clinical accuracy of dynamic navigation is comparable to static navigation, but there is great heterogeneity in dynamic navigation systems, indicating a need for further research to validate their feasibility.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
(2021)
Article
Medicine, General & Internal
Cornelia Edelmann, Martin Wetzel, Anne Knipper, Ralph G. Luthardt, Sigmar Schnutenhaus
Summary: The study found that precise implantation was possible with the dynamic navigation system used, which can improve the quality of implant positioning, especially in minimally invasive procedures. The clinical trial demonstrated a clinical benefit and effectiveness of dynamic navigation in implant surgery.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
(2021)
Review
Medicine, General & Internal
Shengchi Fan, Gustavo Saenz-Ravello, Leonardo Diaz, Yiqun Wu, Ruben Davo, Feng Wang, Marko Magic, Bilal Al-Nawas, Peer W. Kaemmerer
Summary: The study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of different approaches for zygomatic implant (ZI) placement in patients with severe maxillary problems. The results showed that dynamic computer-aided surgery (d-CAIS) and modified static computer-aided surgery (s-CAIS) had clinically acceptable outcomes, while the conventional s-CAIS had the highest deviation values. Surgeons should be aware of potential deviations and complications regardless of the selected approach.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
(2023)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Anna Takacs, Eszter Hardi, Bianca Golzio Navarro Cavalcante, Bence Szabo, Barbara Kispelyi, Arpad Joob-Fancsaly, Krisztina Mikulas, Gabor Varga, Peter Hegyi, Marton Kivovics
Summary: This meta-analysis evaluates the accuracy of different computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) techniques and finds that fully guided static CAIS has the highest accuracy, while augmented reality and robotic CAIS show promise as alternative options.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
(2023)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Sihui Zhang, Qin Cai, Weiyi Chen, Yuxuan Lin, Yan Gao, Dong Wu, Jiang Chen
Summary: This study compared the deviations between implant planning and placement using dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (d-CAIS) and autonomous robotic computer-assisted implant surgery (r-CAIS) methods. The results showed that r-CAIS achieved more accurate implant placement compared to d-CAIS, with no significant difference in patient satisfaction between the two groups.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
(2023)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Thanida Yotpibulwong, Sirida Arunjaroensuk, Boosana Kaboosaya, Phonkit Sinpitaksakul, Mansuang Arksornnukit, Nikos Mattheos, Atiphan Pimkhaokham
Summary: The objective of this study was to compare the implant accuracy of combined static and dynamic CAIS with static, dynamic CAIS, and freehand surgery for single implant placement. The results showed that the combined static and dynamic CAIS provided significantly higher accuracy compared to the other methods.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
(2023)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
David Schneider, Caroline Sax, Manuel Sancho-Puchades, Christoph H. F. Hammerle, Ronald Ernst Jung
Summary: The study compared free-hand implant planning and placement with computer-assisted implant planning and placement (CAIPP) in achieving the planned implant position. The results showed that CAIPP protocols resulted in smaller deviations regardless of tooth gap size, while in the free-hand group, gap size only influenced angular errors.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
(2021)
Review
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Adria Jorba-Garcia, Albert Gonzalez-Barnadas, Octavi Camps-Font, Rui Figueiredo, Eduard Valmaseda-Castellon
Summary: The study assessed the accuracy of dynamic computer-aided implant surgery systems in placing dental implants, finding that these systems are more accurate than static computer-aided implant surgery systems and freehand implant placement.
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS
(2021)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Feifei Ma, Feng Sun, Tai Wei, Yu Ma
Summary: This study compares the accuracy of dental implant placement using dynamic navigation with U-tube or cusp registration methods. The results show that there is no significant difference in accuracy between the two methods. The cusp registration method may be more convenient for clinical use without the need for additional devices and further research is warranted.
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH
(2022)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Marton Kivovics, Anna Takacs, Dorottya Penzes, Orsolya Nemeth, Eitan Mijiritsky
Summary: This in vitro study compared the accuracy of implant placement in model surgeries using three different methods. The results showed that the accuracy of AR-based dynamic navigation was comparable to static CAIS and superior to the free-hand method in terms of implant positioning.
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
(2022)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Adria Jorba-Garcia, Jose Javier Bara-Casaus, Octavi Camps-Font, Maria angeles Sanchez-Garces, Rui Figueiredo, Eduard Valmaseda-Castellon
Summary: This study evaluated the accuracy of dental implant placement using a dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (dCAIS) system and a freehand approach, and compared the patients' perception and quality of life with the two approaches. The results showed that the dCAIS system significantly improved implant placement accuracy compared to the freehand approach, but it also increased the surgical time and did not improve patient satisfaction or reduce postoperative pain.
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH
(2023)
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Lijuan Ma, Mingjun Ye, Mingle Wu, Xiaolei Chen, Shan Shen
Summary: The accuracy of implant placement assisted by a dynamic navigation system meets the clinical needs and is higher than that of traditional implants. Different jaw positions, lateral locations, and implant diameters and lengths do not affect the accuracy of dental implants guided by the dynamic navigation system. The tip deviation in the anterior teeth area is greater than in the posterior teeth area. As the number of dynamic implantation procedures performed by the same implant doctor increases, the angle deviation gradually decreases.
Article
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Anna Takacs, Gyula Marada, Kinga Turzo, Akos Nagy, Orsolya Nemeth, Eitan Mijiritsky, Marton Kivovics, Attila Muhl
Summary: The accuracy of implant placement in model surgeries was compared according to the design of the drills used. Using step drills instead of straight drills for final osteotomies decreased deviation from the surgical plan, and the fully guided approach performed better than the pilot-guided sCAIS.
Article
Health Care Sciences & Services
Tai Wei, Feifei Ma, Feng Sun, Yu Ma
Summary: This study compared the U-tube and cusp dynamic navigation system registration methods for dental implant placement and assessed the impact of missing teeth location on these registrations. The results showed that both methods had acceptable accuracy with no significant difference. However, the U-tube method showed significant difference when assessing the location of missing teeth, while cusp registration was unaffected. Therefore, the cusp dynamic navigation system registration technique is not only accurate but also overcomes the limitations of the U-tube approach and deserves further clinical research.
JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE
(2023)