4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The Modulatory Effect of Anthocyanins from Purple Sweet Potato on Human Intestinal Microbiota in Vitro

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 64, 期 12, 页码 2582-2590

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00586

关键词

purple sweet potato; anthocyanins; intestinal microbiota; modulatory effect; prebiotic-like activity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31501473]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LQ15C200003]
  3. K.C. Wong Magna Fund at Ningbo University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to investigate the modulatory effect of purple sweet potato anthocyanins (PSPAs) on human intestinal microbiota, PSPAs were prepared by column chromatography and their influence on intestinal microbiota was analyzed by monitoring the bacterial populations and analyzing short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations at different time points. The numbers (log(10) cell/mL) of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus/Enterococcus spp., Bacteroides-Prevotella, Clostridium histolyticum, and total bacteria after 24 h of culture in anaerobic fermentation broth containing PSPAs were 8.44 +/- 0.02, 8.30 +/- 0.01, 7.80 +/- 0.03, 7.60 +/- 0.03, and 9.00 +/- 0.02, respectively, compared with 8.21 +/- 0.03, 8.12 +/- 0.02, 7.95 +/- 0.02, 7.77 +/- 0.02, and 9.01 0.03, respectively, in the controls. The results showed that PSPAs induced the proliferation of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus/Enterococcus spp., inhibited the growth of Bacteroides-Prevotella and Clostridium histolyticum, and did not affect the total bacteria number. Total SCFA concentrations in the cultures with PSPAs were significantly higher than in the controls (P < 0.05). Moreover, during the fermentation, the PSPAs were partially fragmented to phenolic acids, which may exert a better effect on intestinal microecology, suggesting that PSPAs may have prebiotic-like activity by generating SCFAs and modulating the intestinal microbiota, contributing to improvements in human health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据