4.6 Article

Superiority of three-way decisions from the perspective of probability

期刊

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW
卷 56, 期 2, 页码 1263-1295

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10462-022-10203-7

关键词

Three-way decisions; Two-way decisions; Classification precision; Cost of information acquisition; Confidence level

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper analyzes the superiority of three-way decisions (3WDs) over traditional two-way decisions (2WDs) and proposes a 3WDs model based on confidence level and sample mean. Experiments show that this model can effectively reduce the cost of information acquisition and has similar classification accuracy to the 2WDs model.
Three-way decisions (3WDs) is a typical method for dealing with uncertain issues. It is essentially an extension of two-way decisions (2WDs). What is the superiority of 3WDs/S3WDs over traditional 2WDs? Only a few studies have analyzed the theoretical superiority of 3WDs over traditional 2WDs. The motivation of this paper is to theoretically analyze the superiority of 3WDs over 2WDs in dealing with classification problems. From the perspective of probability, 3WDs is compared with 2WDs for a thorough discussion and analysis of the superiority of 3WDs in this paper. First, it is proved that increasing information can effectively improve classification precision in terms of the sample mean, misclassification probability, and interval of uncertain classification. Second, a novel 3WDs model/sequential three-way decisions model (3WDM-CLSM/S3WDM-CLSM) based on confidence level and sample mean is proposed, and the corresponding method for calculating the pair of thresholds based on the confidence level is presented. Third, the superiority of 3WDs compared to 2WDs is analyzed in terms of classification precision and cost of information acquisition (CIA). Finally, experiments are completed to show that the 3WDs model can effectively reduce the CIA, and its classification accuracy is close to that of the 2WDs model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据