4.7 Article

Asymptotically optimal sampling-based kinodynamic planning

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROBOTICS RESEARCH
卷 35, 期 5, 页码 528-564

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0278364915614386

关键词

Motion planning; asymptotic optimality; sampling-based algorithms; kinodynamic planning; steering functions

类别

资金

  1. NSF [IIS-1451737, CCF-1330789]
  2. NASA [NNX13AL71H]
  3. NASA [469977, NNX13AL71H] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  4. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  5. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [1451737] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sampling-based algorithms are viewed as practical solutions for high-dimensional motion planning. Recent progress has taken advantage of random geometric graph theory to show how asymptotic optimality can also be achieved with these methods. Achieving this desirable property for systems with dynamics requires solving a two-point boundary value problem (BVP) in the state space of the underlying dynamical system. It is difficult, however, if not impractical, to generate a BVP solver for a variety of important dynamical models of robots or physically simulated ones. Thus, an open challenge was whether it was even possible to achieve optimality guarantees when planning for systems without access to a BVP solver. This work resolves the above question and describes how to achieve asymptotic optimality for kinodynamic planning using incremental sampling-based planners by introducing a new rigorous framework. Two new methods, STABLE_SPARSE_RRT (SST) and SST*, result from this analysis, which are asymptotically near-optimal and optimal, respectively. The techniques are shown to converge fast to high-quality paths, while they maintain only a sparse set of samples, which makes them computationally efficient. The good performance of the planners is confirmed by experimental results using dynamical systems benchmarks, as well as physically simulated robots.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据