4.8 Article

Experimental realization of non-Abelian permutations in a three-state non-Hermitian system

期刊

NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwac010

关键词

non-Abelian permutation; non-Hermitian physics; topological physics; acoustics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11922416, 11802256, 12174072]
  2. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [12302420, 12300419, 22302718, C6013-18 G]
  3. Hong Kong Baptist University [RC-SGT2/18-19/SCI/006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, non-Abelian state permutations are experimentally demonstrated in a non-Hermitian system. The eigenstates in this system can evolve across different manifolds, corresponding to state permutation. By encircling exceptional arcs, five non-trivial permutations are achieved, indicating the existence of non-Abelian groups in non-Hermitian systems.
Resting on the novel non-Hermitian topology, we experimentally demonstrate state permutations in a non-Hermitian system follow non-Abelian, or order-dependent exchange rules. Eigenstates of a non-Hermitian system exist on complex Riemannian manifolds, with multiple sheets connecting at branch cuts and exceptional points (EPs). These eigenstates can evolve across different sheets-a process that naturally corresponds to state permutation. Here, we report the first experimental realization of non-Abelian permutations in a three-state non-Hermitian system. Our approach relies on the stroboscopic encircling of two different exceptional arcs (EAs), which are smooth trajectories of order-2 EPs appearing from the coalescence of two adjacent states. The non-Abelian characteristics are confirmed by encircling the EAs in opposite sequences. A total of five non-trivial permutations are experimentally realized, which together comprise a non-Abelian group. Our approach provides a reliable way of investigating non-Abelian state permutations and the related exotic winding effects in non-Hermitian systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据