National Science Review

期刊名
National Science Review

NATL SCI REV

ISSN / eISSN
2095-5138 / 2053-714X
目标和范围
Under the auspices of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Review is a new journal aimed at reviewing cutting-edge developments across science and technology in China and around the world. Initially published quarterly, the journal will focus on topics of interest to the international science community, including multi-national collaborations, global issues in scientific and technological development, and their impact on society in general.
研究方向

综合性期刊

CiteScore
22.90 查看趋势图
CiteScore 学科排名
类别 分区 排名
Multidisciplinary - Multidisciplinary Q1 #4/134
Web of Science 核心合集
Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI)
Indexed -
类别 (Journal Citation Reports 2023) 分区
MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES - SCIE Q1
H-index
30
出版国家或地区
PEOPLES R CHINA
出版商
Oxford University Press
年文章数
230
Open Access
NO
通讯方式
GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX2 6DP
认证评论
注: 认证评论选取于全球各个学术评论平台和社交媒体。
On March 1, 2022, I submitted a paper through the system of A*STAR in Singapore. For 30 days, the system status consistently showed "Awaiting admin processing." Since I had never encountered such a situation, I emailed the journal to inquire about the status of my manuscript. The assistant's reply was, "We will arrange for the initial review soon." The next day, unsurprisingly, I received a rejection letter, which was a template rejection and clearly showed that they did not even read the content of my article (probably because the corresponding author was not a well-known figure). After submitting papers for so many years, this is the first time I have encountered such a frustrating journal. They didn't provide an initial review within 30 days and rejected it as soon as I pushed for an update. Our group strongly boycotts such journals! Everyone, take care of yourselves, and if you don't agree, try submitting your own articles (excluding those in the prominent authors' group). I have all the records of my submissions, reminder emails, and rejection letters, and I am not afraid to report them!
2022-04-02
The timeline for submission has been carefully reviewed. It can be said that the efficiency of NSR editors is quite high. The comments from the first review were very professional and recognized the work. Of course, there were also sharp questions in the review comments, so a lot of experiments and theories were added. NSR has a high positioning, and there are many groundbreaking and record-breaking works in it, expecting further expansion of influence. We are all highly educated researchers and should not be sour grapes. Objectively speaking, as long as the work is sufficiently in place, the editors will definitely give it serious consideration.
2023-04-30

Discover Peeref hubs

Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.

Join a conversation

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started